Doonesbury equals ultrasound with rape. A Limerick.

Obamacare: The end to freedom of religion? A Limerick.

The effort to Canonize Sandra Kay Fluke
Drags virtue and character down in the muck
Religious freedom
Reduced to a serfdom.
The nanny-state mandate is starting to suck

The Obama recovery. Cost: One million per job.

The Federal continuing resolution spending allocation ran up an all-time record deficit for the month of February 2012: 229 Billion dollars.
The economy added 227 thousand new jobs for the same month.
Running a budget deficit is stimulating the economy, leading to job growth.
Every job created last month cost our grandchildren over one million dollars.
This is the Obama recovery.

Karl Rove! Eat your snot! Endorse Sarah Palin for the good of our country!

Karl Rove mockingly dismissed the value of Sarah and Todd Palin’s endorsements on a private conference call March 7, noting that their backing of Newt Gingrich in Alaska “demonstrated that endorsements don’t mean snot.”
We have an old saying in the fishing villages of western Sweden.
“That is not lost which flows out of your nose into your mouth.”
Karl Rove! Eat your snot!
If you love this country and your beloved establishment Republican Party, try to recognize reality and embrace Sarah Palin before it is too late!
Your chosen candidate is Mitt Romney is a lackluster candidate if I ever saw one. The Democrats will make mince-meat out of him in the general election portraying him as an old, rich fogey, out of touch with the struggling masses, and they have about one hour’s worth of gaffes to prove it.
Newt Gingrich, a brilliant man who would actually tackle the problems facing this country, but he has more baggage than you can carry on a Commercial Airliner.
Rick Santorum, an honest man with an honest world-view, but he is too easily demonized by the media and the Democrat machine.
Ron Paul, a man with convictions and honest opinions, but his mantle will have to be taken over by his son.
This leaves us Sarah Palin. Her name recognition is as high as Barack Obama’s, her charm surpasses his. As opposed to Barack Obama she is supremely qualified to be Commander in Chief. She accomplished more in her two years as Governor than most Governors do in two terms. She is personally conservative, but governed as a centrist. She is by far the most vetted presidential candidate in history. The Republican Establishment, nearly all of the media and for sure the Democrats have been trying to destroy her since the day she entered on the scene. They have gone after her husband, her children and even burned her church. When Gabrielle Giffords was shot by a leftist madman they put the blame squarely on Sarah Palin. Yet she is stronger now than any presidential candidate in history.
Karl! For the sake of the future of this nation: Repent and ask Sarah Palin to run for president!

Karl Rove’s opinion on Palins’ endorsement of Gingrich: Not worth snot. A Limerick.

Karl Rove mockingly dismissed the value of Sarah and Todd Palin’s endorsements on a private conference call March 7, noting that their backing of Newt Gingrich in Alaska “demonstrated that endorsements don’t mean snot.”

Karl said: Her endorsement is not worth a snot
He may be “The architect,” wise he is not.
Got scared out of his wits
over Sarah’s true grits.
Establishment game plan: All tied in a knot.

Sarah Palin said: Nobody is going to ask me to run. A Limerick.

An urgent message to Sarah Palin.
While interviewed by Uma Pemmaraju on Fox News Mar 3 you said:
“Nobody’s going to ask me to run”
How about that statement!
This calls for a Limerick:
“Nobody’s going to ask me to run”
Some think you are someone to shun.
But not “We the People”
We are not just sheeple.
We ask you, implore you to run.

Please explain your theology, Mr. President.

Mr. President!

On the resent National Prayer Breakfast in Washington D.C. you said:

“Jesus would back my tax-the-rich policy.”

You went on to say that your understanding of the Bible is the basis for your economic policies.

Campaigning in Ohio, presidential candidate Rick Santorum was criticizing your radical environmental views, which he said hurt the American people.

“It’s not about you [people],” Santorum declared. “It’s not about your quality of life. It’s not about your jobs. It’s about some phony ideal. Some phony theology. Oh, not a theology based on the Bible — a different theology.”

Very few commented on your statements at the prayer breakfast. People seem to be perfectly happy that you are using your understanding of the Bible as the basis for your polices.

When Rick Santorum challenges you on your understanding of the Bible, saying that your theology is open to challenge, everybody is jumping on him, saying that any criticism of your Christian belief is over the line.

You invited a discussion on your understanding of the Bible since you use it as the basis for your economic polices.

What is your biblical basis for not having an opinion whether we should have a budget or not?

What is your biblical understanding on abortion? The only references on abortion I can find in the Bible are child sacrifices, as was practiced in Baal worship. Is that your basis?

Where is the biblical justification for Government regulation trumping Religion?

Please let me know where you stand on the Bible since it is your understanding of the Bible that is the basis for your economic polices.

You were in Rev. Jeremy Wright’s Church for twenty years. You said you never listened to his sermons. How did you obtain your understanding of the Bible?

Will we pass an energy bill finally? A Limerick.

Gov. Sarah Palin tweeted February 17, 2012:

“SarahPalinUSA: House passes energy bill. Will Pres. Obama & Senate Democrat leadership ignore it while Americans face $4 a gallon gas?

The House on Thursday evening passed a bill that seeks to encourage oil shale development, drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR), and offshore drilling in the Atlantic, Pacific and the Gulf of Mexico, as well as force approval of the Keystone XL oil sands pipeline.

The House approved the bill on a mostly party line vote of 237-187.

On eight occasions, the current occupant of the White House (Obama) has referred to the Spanish model as an example to follow.

After a leaked Spanish government report, a newspaper in Spain (La Gaceta) confirms that the country’s “green economy” policies — the model for the Obama administration’s “green jobs” efforts — have been a disaster: expensive, ineffective, and unworkable

The official jobless rate in Spain went from 7.9% in May 2007 to 19% in Nov 2009. It now stands at 22.8% (Jan 2012)

The Spanish Socialist Workers’ Party (Spanish: Partido Socialista Obrero Español [parˈtiðo soθjaˈlista oˈβrero espaˈɲol], PSOE [peˈsoe]) is a social-democratic political party in Spain. Since the General election on 14 March 2004, the PSOE has been the governing party of Spain. The PSOE is a full member of the Party of European Socialists and the Socialist International.

MADRID — Spaniards struggling with high unemployment and a credit squeeze delivered a punishing verdict on almost eight years of Socialist government at the ballot box on Nov 20 2011, turning to the conservative Popular Party in the hopes of alleviating the pain of Europe’s debt crisis. The Popular Party, led by Mariano Rajoy won 186 seats and a governing majority in the 350-seat lower house of Parliament, while the governing Socialists plummeted to 110 seats from 169. It was the Popular Party’s best showing, and the Socialists’ worst, since Spain’s return to democracy in the 1970s.

Jan 27 2012 Fitch Ratings has resolved the Negative Rating Watch on six Eurozone sovereigns, downgrading the IDRs for Belgium, Cyprus, Italy, Slovenia and Spain while affirming ratings for Ireland. The Negative Outlook on all six countries indicates a slightly greater than 50% chance of a downgrade over a two-year time horizon.

Oh, and gasoline in Spain is upwards of $5.75 a gallon.

Obama: Let’s follow the path set by Spain.
Will the Senators block common sense once again?
Sarah Palin makes sense
She is not on the fence:
Live free! Independence again let’s attain!

Microchip Implanted to Deliver Drug Shows Promise? A Limerick.

Scientists have conducted the first human trial of an implantable microchip-based drug delivery device, an assembly that releases precise doses of a drug through a wireless communication link and receives return messages confirming proper operation.

In cooperation with two commercial companies, scientists at Harvard, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Case Western Reserve University created a chip that holds measured doses of teriparatide (brand name Forteo), an injectable drug used to treat osteoporosis.

Dr. Ethel Siris, a professor of clinical medicine and director of the Osteoporosis Center at Columbia University Medical Center, said that Forteo was a very effective drug but difficult to administer, and that this kind of technology could prove useful.

“I can see many problems with the practical application,” she said. “But whether Forteo is the drug that’s going to get administered with this or some other kind of injectable, it’s pretty neat stuff.” Excerpts from a news release by NICHOLAS BAKALAR, February 17, 2012 , NYT. .

Hmm. “Some other kind of injectable.” I don’t like where this is taking us.

Population control made en mass
Now a chip comes from MIT, Mass.
With injection of drugs
It’s beyond Atlas Shrugs.
With a mind-control drug they’ll all power amass.

98% of Catholic women use contraception. Really?

Planned Parenthood and NARAL (National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League) are telling their members that 98% of Catholic women use contraception.

My first observation is that this is a surprisingly large percentage. One Catholic woman in fifty is not using birth control. How can that be? Why would an 80 year old nun use birth control? 10% of all women are lesbians (this is a statistic that cannot be challenged), what type of birth control do they use? Or, is the very fact that they are lesbians a form of birth control? If so, why use the word contraception?

Planned Parenthood is quoting from a study made by the pro-abortion Guttmacher Institute, a former Planned Parenthood affiliate. Did they exclude any women from their study, thus inflating the numbers?

Indeed they did. They included only women between the ages 15-44, normal child-bearing age. They excluded any woman who had not been sexually active in the last 3 months. They also excluded all postpartum or pregnant women. All women trying to get pregnant were also excluded. In fact, the only women included in the study were (pg.8 of the study) “those for whom a pregnancy would be unintended and who are “at risk” of becoming pregnant.” It is unclear if women whose attitude is: While I am not trying to get pregnant I am trusting in God, and if I do get pregnant it is the will of God to do a miracle in me. My hunch is that more than one Catholic woman in 50 has that attitude, so they would have to have been excluded as well.

The study probably should have been stated: 98% of all Catholic women using the services of Planned Parenthood use contraceptives and other forms of birth control, such as abortifacients and abortion. That may be close to the truth.

Nancy Pelosi is informed as always. The hearing was on the constitutionality of the mandate, not biology.

This is her attitude to the Constitution of the United States: